Class 2 - The Organizing Framework Behind US Science Agencies

• Resource Home
• Syllabus
• Class Sessions

Students will take away from this class the foundational concepts that led to the way the US organizes its science and technology mission agencies, and review alternative models that led to more connected science systems.

This class will posit the argument that Sci/Tech organization is a third direct innovation factor, and will examine the organizational framework behind the mix of U.S. science agencies, as well as their missions and research organizational models. It will examine the DARPA model as an organizational alternative. This class will look at the innovation system at the institutional level, emphasizing the organization of federal science support.

The class will start with a review of key organizational developments in science, technology and health federal support, focusing on the organizational models for the missions of these science-support organizations. Potential strengths of government-supported R&D (selection neutrality and long-range focus) as well as concerns (peer review tending toward incremental progress not breakthroughs and isolation from application connections) will be discussed. The pre-WWII organization, the transformation of science during WWII under Vannevar Bush and Alfred Loomis, and the creation of the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation after the war will be discussed.

The review will focus on the overall organizational structure and note the following developments:

• Alfred Loomis and the FFRDC (Federally-Funded Research and Development Corporation) model at MIT's RadLab — the outside contract R and D entity.
• The origins at Los Alamos of the National Energy Labs – the in-house basic science challenge model.
• Vannevar Bush and the "Endless Frontier" – in the wake of WW2's focus on applied research, Bush's proposal for government science support focused on fundamental research.
• Origins of NSF based on federal support of outside, university-based fundamental research, under Vannevar Bush's model.
• Origins of DARPA based on a focused revolutionary research model outside the industry-university collaboration model. There will be a discussion focused on the DARPA organizational model as an organizing alternative to the V. Bush basic research model. DARPA's role in innovation on both the institutional and personal levels of innovation will be reviewed.
• Also noted will be the Bayh-Dole Act and the role of university research in development with industry.

Lecture Notes

Lecture 2 (PDF - 1.4MB)

Readings

Required Reading

Bonvillian, William B. "Power Play – The DARPA Model and U.S. Energy Policy." The American Interest 11 (November/December, 2006): pp. 39-48.

Other Readings for Discussion

Hart, David. Forged Consensus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998. ISBN: 9780691026671. [Preview with Google Books]

Stokes, Donald E. Pasteur's Quadrant, Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1997, pp. 1-25, 45-57, and 58-89. ISBN: 9780815781776. [Preview with Google Books]

Ruttan, Vernon W. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 21-31, 91-111, and 115-129. ISBN: 9780195188042. [Preview with Google Books]