Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoung, William E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T05:16:16Z
dc.date.available2022-04-04T05:16:16Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/141616
dc.descriptionPoster presented in the workshop on “Who Controls Cyberspace,” MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States, November 6-7, 2012.en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom Cyber Security to Mission Assurance: Improving Campaign Mission Assurance. How can we complete campaign mission across a wide range of degradations? Current gaps: 1) Emergent system properties ignored 2) Assurance restricted to tactical level, and 3) Ignores Operational (campaign) Design. Solution: 1) Use systems thinking, and 2) Leverage safety-guided designen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-09-1-0597. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherExplorations in Cyber International Relationsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleCyber mission assurance using STPAen_US
dc.typeOther (Poster)en_US
dc.identifier.citationWilliam, E. Y.-Jr. (2012, November 6–7). Cyber mission assurance using STPA [Poster session]. ECIR Workshop on "Who Controls Cyberspace," MIT, Cambridge, MA.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record