Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Jing
dc.contributor.authorMicali, Silvio
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T14:56:34Z
dc.date.available2022-04-06T14:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2012.01.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/141701
dc.description.abstractWe show that collusion and wrong beliefs may cause a dramatic efficiency loss in the Vickrey mechanism for auctioning a single good in limited supply. We thus put forward a new mechanism guaranteeing efficiency in a very adversarial collusion model, where the players can partition themselves into arbitrarily many coalitions, exchange money with each other, and perfectly coordinate their actions. Our mechanism bypasses classic impossibility results (such as those of Green and Laffont, and of Schummer) by providing the players with a richer set of strategies, making it dominant for every coalition C to instruct each of its members to report truthfully not only his own valuation, but also his belonging to C. Our mechanism is coalitionally rational, which implies being individually rational for independent players.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based on work supported by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, Grant No. N00014-09-1-0597. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations therein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisher© Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleCollusive dominant-strategy truthfulnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChen, J., & Micali, S. (2012). Collusive dominant-strategy truthfulness. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(3), 1300–1312.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscript.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record