Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXue, Yanfeng
dc.date.accessioned2004-02-13T19:27:21Z
dc.date.available2004-02-13T19:27:21Z
dc.date.issued2004-02-13T19:27:21Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/4049
dc.description.abstractFirms obtain new technology either through internal R&D or through acquisitions. These two approaches are usually labeled as "make" and "buy" strategies. In this paper, I examine the relation between a firm's choice of "make" or "buy" and the performance measures used in the firm's CEO compensation contract. I focus on the two major differences between "make" and "buy" strategies: the risk levels and accounting treatments. I then examine the differential implications of accounting-based and stock-based performance measures on managers' incentive in choosing between the two strategies. Using data from US high tech industries, I find that, firms relying on "buy" approach to obtain technology tend to depend more on the accounting-based performance measures, while those firms who innovate through R&D activities skew toward stock-based pay especially stock optionsen
dc.format.extent194036 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4436-03
dc.subjectR&Den
dc.subjectAcquisitionen
dc.subjectCompensationen
dc.subjectTechnologyen
dc.titleMake or Buy New Technology – a CEO Compensation Contract’s Role in a Firm’s Route to Innovationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record