dc.contributor.author | Xue, Yanfeng | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004-02-13T19:27:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2004-02-13T19:27:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-02-13T19:27:21Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/4049 | |
dc.description.abstract | Firms obtain new technology either through internal R&D or through acquisitions. These two approaches are usually labeled as "make" and "buy" strategies. In this paper, I examine the relation between a firm's choice of "make" or "buy" and the performance measures used in the firm's CEO compensation contract. I focus on the two major differences between "make" and "buy" strategies: the risk levels and accounting treatments. I then examine the differential implications of accounting-based and stock-based performance measures on managers' incentive in choosing between the two strategies. Using data from US high tech industries, I find that, firms relying on "buy" approach to obtain technology tend to depend more on the accounting-based performance measures, while those firms who innovate through R&D activities skew toward stock-based pay especially stock options | en |
dc.format.extent | 194036 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4436-03 | |
dc.subject | R&D | en |
dc.subject | Acquisition | en |
dc.subject | Compensation | en |
dc.subject | Technology | en |
dc.title | Make or Buy New Technology – a CEO Compensation Contract’s Role in a Firm’s Route to Innovation | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |