dc.contributor.author | Alvarez, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Ansolabehere, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Antonsson, Erik | |
dc.contributor.author | Bruck, Jehoshua | |
dc.contributor.author | Graves, Steven | |
dc.contributor.author | Palfrey, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Negroponte, Nicholas Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivest, Ronald L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Selker, Ted | |
dc.contributor.author | Slocum, Alexander H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stewart III, Charles H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-14T16:12:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-14T16:12:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-03-30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96539 | |
dc.description.abstract | American elections are conducted using a hodge-podge of different voting technologies: paper ballots, lever machines, punch cards, optically scanned ballots, and electronic machines. And the technologies we use change frequently. Over the last two decades, counties have moved away from paper ballots and lever machines and toward optically scanned ballots and electronic machines. The changes have not occurred from a concerted initiative, but from local experimentation. Some local governments have even opted to go back to the older methods of paper and levers. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | VTP Working Paper Series;2 | |
dc.subject | Voting equipment | en_US |
dc.subject | Voting technology reliability | en_US |
dc.subject | Residual votes | en_US |
dc.subject | Overvotes | en_US |
dc.subject | Undervotes | en_US |
dc.title | Residual Votes Attributable to Technology: An Assessment of the Reliability of Existing Voting Equipment | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |