Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAnsolabehere, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorAntonsson, Erik
dc.contributor.authorBruck, Jehoshua
dc.contributor.authorGraves, Steven
dc.contributor.authorPalfrey, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorNegroponte, Nicholas Peter
dc.contributor.authorRivest, Ronald L.
dc.contributor.authorSelker, Ted
dc.contributor.authorSlocum, Alexander H.
dc.contributor.authorStewart III, Charles H.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T16:12:56Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T16:12:56Z
dc.date.issued2001-03-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96539
dc.description.abstractAmerican elections are conducted using a hodge-podge of different voting technologies: paper ballots, lever machines, punch cards, optically scanned ballots, and electronic machines. And the technologies we use change frequently. Over the last two decades, counties have moved away from paper ballots and lever machines and toward optically scanned ballots and electronic machines. The changes have not occurred from a concerted initiative, but from local experimentation. Some local governments have even opted to go back to the older methods of paper and levers.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;2
dc.subjectVoting equipmenten_US
dc.subjectVoting technology reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectResidual votesen_US
dc.subjectOvervotesen_US
dc.subjectUndervotesen_US
dc.titleResidual Votes Attributable to Technology: An Assessment of the Reliability of Existing Voting Equipmenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record