Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, R. Michael
dc.contributor.authorHall, Thad E.
dc.contributor.authorLlewellyn, Morgan
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T20:41:44Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T20:41:44Z
dc.date.issued2006-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96584
dc.description.abstractMuch has been said since the 2000 presidential election regarding the administration of elections in the United States, particularly in regards to how election administrators are selected and to whom they are responsive. Unfortunately, there has been little research on the different administrative structures that are possible and the preferences of Americans regarding these different administrative options. In this paper we present the results from a national survey of Americans, in which we asked them their preference for whether elections should be run by partisan or nonpartisan officials, whether the officials should be elected or appointed, and whether the administration of elections should be by a single unitary executive or by an election commission. In addition to eliciting the basic preferences of Americans about these administrative choices, we also undertake a deeper analysis of these data to determine the underlying patterns in support for the different administrative options.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCarnegie Corporation of New York; University of Utah. Center for Public Policy and Administration; Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;47
dc.subjectElection governanceen_US
dc.subjectPartisan election administrationen_US
dc.subjectElection administrationen_US
dc.titleWho Should Run Our Elections? Public Opinion About Election Governance in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record