dc.contributor.author | Rivest, Ronald L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-15T11:56:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-15T11:56:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-04-29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96592 | |
dc.description.abstract | We address the problem of auditing an election when precincts may have different sizes, and suggest methods for picking a sample of precincts to audit that takes precinct size into account. one method yields optimal auditing strategies together with an exact measure of its effectiveness (probability of detecting corruption of a given size).
We restrict attention to basic auditing strategies, in which each precinct P is audited independently with some probability p determined by the auditor. The auditing probability for a precinct will depend on the size of the precinct, with larger precincts audited more frequently; when all precincts have the same size they will have the same probability of being audited. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | VTP Working Paper Series;55 | |
dc.subject | Auditing elections | en_US |
dc.subject | Precinct sizes | en_US |
dc.subject | Sampling | en_US |
dc.subject | Auditing strategies | en_US |
dc.title | On Auditing Elections When Precincts Have Different Sizes | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |