Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRivest, Ronald L.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-15T11:56:34Z
dc.date.available2015-04-15T11:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2007-04-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96592
dc.description.abstractWe address the problem of auditing an election when precincts may have different sizes, and suggest methods for picking a sample of precincts to audit that takes precinct size into account. one method yields optimal auditing strategies together with an exact measure of its effectiveness (probability of detecting corruption of a given size). We restrict attention to basic auditing strategies, in which each precinct P is audited independently with some probability p determined by the auditor. The auditing probability for a precinct will depend on the size of the precinct, with larger precincts audited more frequently; when all precincts have the same size they will have the same probability of being audited.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;55
dc.subjectAuditing electionsen_US
dc.subjectPrecinct sizesen_US
dc.subjectSamplingen_US
dc.subjectAuditing strategiesen_US
dc.titleOn Auditing Elections When Precincts Have Different Sizesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record