Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSances, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorStewart III, Charles H.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-16T15:05:53Z
dc.date.available2015-04-16T15:05:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96647
dc.description.abstractTo what degree is voter confidence in election procedures driven by satisfaction with the outcome of an election, as opposed to trust in government or objective features of the polling place, such as voting technology? Using approximately 30 national surveys over the past decade, we find a consistent relationship between voting for the winner and confidence in election administration. This confidence varies as a function of question wording and electoral context. Respondents are more confident in the quality of the vote count locally than nationally. They are responsive to electoral results at the state and national levels in forming their judgements. And, rather than being influenced by different types of voting technology, respondents lose confidence by virtue of change itself.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCaltech/MIT Voting Technology Projecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVTP Working Paper Series;125
dc.subjectVoter confidenceen_US
dc.subjectLegitimacyen_US
dc.subjectPublic opinionen_US
dc.subjectWinner effecten_US
dc.subjectElection administrationen_US
dc.titlePartisanship and Voter Confidence, 2000-2012en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record